Quote:
Originally Posted by Achilles87
![View Post]()
I'm not trying to take up for naps or that manufacture, but if you do a little more research I think you will see naps pulled the ones that tested low.
This is what gives sources bad names, yes not all sources are perfect... not one single source. These products tested low not completely bunk but low and naps pulled them. I don't know what more is wanted from a source.
This is what gives sources bad names, yes not all sources are perfect... not one single source. These products tested low not completely bunk but low and naps pulled them. I don't know what more is wanted from a source.
I remember getting a pack seized & he came thru with complete replacement, had to change thing's up a bit of course..but ya know..the Noble thing to do when realizing , or proven that some item's were either "Bunk" or underdosed , and if he decided to do away with, rather than continue to pawn "less than desirable " gear on.................!
That say's alot in my book! 'SM'